Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

[DOWNLOAD] "Teague-Strebeck Motors Inc. V. Chrysler Insurance Co." by New Mexico Court of Appeals # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Teague-Strebeck Motors Inc. V. Chrysler Insurance Co.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Teague-Strebeck Motors Inc. V. Chrysler Insurance Co.
  • Author : New Mexico Court of Appeals
  • Release Date : January 08, 1999
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 96 KB

Description

{1} This is another in a seemingly endless stream of cases in which an insurance agent has promised more coverage than is provided in the policy. The insurance at issue in this case was for an automobile dealership about to be purchased from a bankrupt corporation. A fire destroyed dealership property and some customer vehicles on the premises. One matter not contested on this appeal is whether the insurer, Chrysler Insurance Company (Chrysler), is bound by the representations of its agent. But there remains a good deal to argue about. On appeal Chrysler contends that (1) the district court erred in adding Mills-Strebeck Autoplex, Inc. (Mills-Strebeck), as a plaintiff after expiration of the limitations period set forth in the insurance contract, (2) the district court erred in awarding damages for bad faith handling of the insurance claim, (3) Mills-Strebeck did not have an insurable interest in the destroyed property, and (4) the award was excessive because it did not take into account the economic interests of third parties in the property. In addition, the Plaintiffs, Teague- Strebeck Motors, Inc. (Teague-Strebeck), and Mills-Strebeck, have cross- appealed. They contend that the district court erred (1) in awarding damages based on the actual cash value of the destroyed property rather than the replacement cost; (2) in setting an inadequate post-judgment interest rate; (3) in not awarding treble damages under the Unfair Practices Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 57-12-1 to -22 (1967, as amended through 1995); and (4) in not awarding punitive damages. We affirm, except in two respects. We remand to determine whether Mills-Strebeck had an insurable interest in the dealership property and, if so, the extent of that interest. Also, we agree with Plaintiffs that a higher post- judgment interest rate should be provided for bad-faith damages.


PDF Books Download "Teague-Strebeck Motors Inc. V. Chrysler Insurance Co." Online ePub Kindle